This book I read, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, it's uniquely structured. The interweaving of a storyline and characters with deep examinations of theoretical fields within science, philosophy, engineering, seems really innovative. I don't know enough about literature to make that claim, though.
One portion I like in particular is about grades. The narrator's past self, Phaedrus, teaches rhetoric at a college. He experiments with abolishing grades for a semester. He believes they're a hindrance to true learning, which arises only from voluntary, self-driven effort. Grades, in his view, mask this true learning by transforming it into a means to a goal; a degree, a quantifiable level of prestige, the grade itself. It's so phony it actively slows down "the cart of civilization," as the author, Robert Pirsig, puts its.
For a while in middle school I didn't care about grades. Then I started wanting better grades because I realized they were important for one reason or another, but I couldn't figure out how to get them. This was a chunk of high school, and I reverted there for part of college (whoops). Finally I deciphered the maneuvers for As.
I don't know if it was maturity. Or the classes got better, especially in college. Or I got smarter. Whatever the culprit, I didn't ever get over thinking grades were rotten deep down. I still think they're overvalued, the trophy of a game that does not test for what is most important, learning, instead rewarding a certain type of memorization and participation. Not that people who get good grades don't learn or have sight of what's important, just that the grades themselves are not fostering that process.
Eh, it's all idealistic.
Anyways, the narrator refers to Quality as the essence of everything, the reality of us and all, the Tao (real one, not spoken one). He proposes that we cannot define "Quality"; it is. It fully encompasses both subjectivity and objectivity. This is an intriguing way of turning things over in the mind.